Beyond sounding public speeches of political leaders and Western sraelieni a reality it must be the record: the so-called “apostles” Western democracy leaders are in fact some cynics button transnational companies, the politico-military complex national and transnational and not least the terrible omnipresent Israeli lobby in the West and discrete-effective in other areas of the planet.
What they are interested in reality the mighty planet?
• Access to resources primarily to the energy.
• markets and weapons test polygons produced by national and transnational military complexes.
• Redrawing the post-Cold War spheres of influence.
• Stopping or slowing the rise of emerging markets.
U.S. WALTZ WITH oppressive regimes and dictate
U.S., who claim to be apostles declarative level of democracy (which they wanted to implement for example in Iraq and NATO bayonets Aghanistan the top) is actually in a position of a python that swallowed prey too large and must somnoleze to loot and burn even if the reality would require to stay awake all the senses. To maintain or, why not expand spheres of influence in the Middle East (and beyond), but also to spare Israel’s hegemonic interests and ambitions in the area have supported and still supports oppressive regimes, usepotential to organize the destabilization by open war or covert operations (as is done in Yemen).
• U.S. support for the Shah of Iran and then Saddam Hussein of Iraq;
• For 30 years, Hosni Mubarak of Egypt was the second recipient on a planetary scale U.S. military aid after Israel;
• For 23 years SUAau Tunisian President Ben Ali backed dictatorship that ended recently.;
• In Yemen, the poorest country in the Arab world, led by Ali Abdullah Saleh, a dictator who has been in power since 1978, the U.S. sponsored war on it’s war against its own people, etc..
Psychosis “GREAT ISRAEL” and MEGAMANIPULAREA with “IRANIAN NUCLEAR THREAT”
Israeli political leaders, voices of the Diaspora Hebrew, journalists, television commentators have already hoarse repeating like a scratched gramophone records song with “nuclear Iran is a threat to world peace, openly or quietly accepted view of a number of Arab despots Gulf. Public opinion in the Arab world is extremely anti-Israel, anti-American and pro-Iran. In 2009, a poll showed that 29% of those polled said a nuclear-armed Iran would be positive for the region, the number of those who believe that crescîndîn 2010-57%. While America, Israel and the leaders of Arab states supporting Iran is the biggest threat to peace and stability in the Middle East, Arabs in the area disagree. A question from the two surveys above the biggest threat to peace in the region has received the following responses:
Israel and the West in statements supporting their support for democracy in Gaza regiune.Atunci but when democratic elections were held in 2006 and Hamas won, the election was seen as “wrong” by Israel and America, and Israel has imposed amerciless blockade of Gaza. Israel obstinately clamează wish for peace with the Arab world but in the meantime obstruct peace negotiations, to accelerate the dispossession of the Palestinian lands in collusion with Mahmoud Abbas and other Palestinian collaborators.
In the 30 years it has ruled Egypt, Mubarak was a bloody despot within the country and a true American yionisto satellite. It was almost a certainty that Mubarak is about to end. In these circumstances, Washington is desperately seeking solutions to the crisis Egypt and Israel, which has undermined yesterday uninspired excellent relations with Turkey is increasingly isolated finds in the Middle East. Egypt is the linchpin of peace in the Middle East. As long as Egypt refrain hostile actions against Israel, other Arab states, Israel can not initiate actions militareîmpotriva. As long as it remains Cairo pro-Western, it serves as an anchor for other governments friendly to the geo-strategic Israel.Miza is huge. Israel sees its role as hegemon threatened Turkey and Iran’s regional ambitions. Washington sees various local and national conflicts in the Middle East, as part of a battle for regional hegemony between the U.S. and Iran. The security environment in the region has changed dramaticîn recent years. Iran has proved agile enough to align with the rise of new forces that enjoys the support of millions of people. United States of America, meanwhile, were uninspired in allied nations ruled by despots against aceştia.Iranul supports Hezbollah, Hamas, and Shiite parties in Iraq. These are the popular forces who wins the election. Hezbollah emerged as champion of the heroic resistance to invasion of the Israeli invasion of Lebanon in 2006, winning the admiration of the Arabs, not only for itself but also for its Iranian backers. Many Arabs also admire Hamas for its refusal to leave power in Gaza despite Israeli presinuii. Marked pro-Iranian forces also major gains in Iraq. They effectively control the Iraqi government, and their most incendiary leader, Moqtada al-Sadr, recently returned to a hero’s welcome after a prolonged stay in Iran. By invading Iraq in 2003, and removing Saddam Hussein from power, the U.S. offered Iran Iraq on a platter of gold .. Now, Iran is preoccupied with consolidating its position in Baghdad. All this explains the latest developments in Tel Aviv deep concern across the latest political developments in Egipt.Fără Egypt, Israel will be left without a friend in the Middle East. Without controlling Mubarak Egypt and relations with Turkey încădere free Israel will be forced to seek new allies in the region potential.
American public opinion increasingly aware that for decades U.S. foreign policy was dictated by the Zionist forces in their administration. . Gilad Atzmon, a dissident Jew and an extreme voice of criticism of Israeli government says the “Releasing the American people” that for decades, America has exhausted its resources to combat the enemies of the state Jew, it sends its boys and girls for to fight and die in wars Zionist. The second war in Iraq was, obviously, such a war and American policy makers have sacrificed the interests of the American people conclude Gilad Atzmon. In concluziepentru United States, an Egyptian Islamist would be a strategic disaster.But the most affected would be Israel, which has focused on national security strategy in its treaty with Egypt, signed by Menachem Begin, then treated aggressively criticized the Israeli right.
apologize for the quality of translation, not speakingEnglish I went to google translate